In terms of business, our company feels safer. We're able to dig in and really understand how things came to be and where to focus our efforts." "Cisco has definitely improved our organization a lot. It also has a File Trajectory, so you can even see if that file has been found on any of your other computers that have AMP." "Device Trajectory is one of the most valuable features. It shows every running process and file access on the computer and saves it like a snapshot when it detects something malicious. It shows the point in time when a virus is downloaded, so you can see if the user was surfing the internet or had a program open. I found that quite good." "Another of my favorite features is called the Device Trajectory, where it shows everything that's going on, on a computer. It has behavioral analytics, so you can be more proactive toward zero-day threats. Because Secure Endpoint has a connection to it, we get protected by it right then and there." "The best feature that we found most valuable, is actually the security product for the endpoint, formerly known as AMP. On the backend, Talos checks all the signatures, all the malware, and for any attacks going on around the world. "Definitely, the best feature for Cisco Secure Endpoint is the integration with Talos. ESET Endpoint Security is the winner in this comparison since its reviewers feel that it is a cost-effective solution.
Service and Support: Users of both solutions are satisfied with the level of support they receive.Ĭomparison Results: Although both solutions received high marks from users, Cortex XDR reviewers feel that it is an expensive product.ROI: Users of both solutions report an ROI.In contrast, ESET Endpoint Security users agree that it is a low-cost solution Pricing: Cortex XDR users write that the solution is expensive.Some users mention that its integration options should improve. Features: Users of both products are satisfied with their scalability and stability.Ĭortex XDR users like its centralized console and say it is a lightweight solution with good AI capabilities, but they would like to see improved reporting.ĮSET Endpoint Security reviewers are happy with its potential threat protection feature and say that it is easy to use, is lightweight, and it provides very good endpoint security.Ease of Deployment: Reviewers of both solutions say that their initial setup is straightforward.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Security based on our users’ reviews in five categories.
0 kommentar(er)
